Lung Cancer – Part Five
Smoking and lung cancer
December 1, 2005
If you’ve been reading the first few posts on this important topic, I’m sure you’ve noticed that I have a real hang-up about smoking. If you thought that, you’re absolutely correct.
I became a smoker when I was only nine-years old. I didn’t become an ex-smoker until I was in my mid-40s. That’s a lot of years to be polluting my lungs. In some of these articles you’ll see that the research will show that if a smoker quits, that person’s lungs may heal to a certain extent. Perhaps that’s true, but it’s not a complete cure. I can attest to that. I have been a non-smoker for over 20 years (now you’ll get an idea of my age if you do some math [smile]) and my lungs are far from being in good shape.
Did quitting help? Yes. I’m sure it did. I would be a lot worse off if I didn’t give up the habit. One of the main difficulties that I have today is the reduced capacity of my lungs. My lungs are diseased and that is the direct result of smoking all those years. If you have never smoked, that is wonderful. Don’t ever start. If you smoke now, realize that if you quit, you may reduce the risk of ever getting lung cancer. Your lungs may, over time, regain some of their health.
I may have been circling the sun for many years now, but I’m in pretty good physical condition. I’m not overweight – I eat very sensibly (good fats – good carbs) – I exercise regularly both cardio and with weights (I own a Bowflex machine!), and live a very healthy lifestyle.
But …..
• I huff and puff whenever I have to climb a flight of stairs.
• I used to be able to go cross-country skiing or snow-shoeing, two sports I really loved. I can’t do either one any longer without gasping for air. That really takes the fun out of it.
• I used to be able to walk at over four miles-per-hour. Now my top speed is around 3.2 mph.
These and several other shortcomings are the direct result of the non-reversible damage done to my lungs because of smoking.
During all my smoking years I never believed that smoking would harm me. I never believed the articles about lung damage and cancer. I was convinced that I was one of those people who wouldn’t be touched by those warnings. Not me! No way!
All I can say is that I was really wrong!
I still can’t avoid breathing in smoke. Second-hand smoke is everywhere. Many people feel that second-hand smoke isn’t that serious. All I can tell you is whenever I’m around cigarette smoke, my lungs go into a sort of spasm. It suddenly becomes very hard to breathe. This can happen when I’m walking down the street and pass by a group of employees who have been banned from smoking inside of a building and are congregated outside to smoke. As I pass them, I temporarily lose the ability to breathe. Once I pass them, that “spasm” disappears. So I know it’s the smoke.
Okay, I’ll get off my soapbox about why I am so fanatical about this topic. My primary reason for this is an honest hope that someone reading this series will quit smoking. It may not give you back your perfectly clear lungs, but you will be better off in so many ways.
The next article which will be out today is a more “impersonal” look at the relationship between smoking and lung cancer.
Until then – don’t light up, okay? Take care of yourself.
Shanti.
****************************************************************************************
DISCLAIMER
These articles were written with great care. However, in spite of this, errors or omissions may occur. These articles are provided “as is” without any warranty whether expressed or implied. All readers of these articles agree to use the information provided in these articles entirely at their own risk and for their own information.
These articles should not be used as a basis for any form of diagnosis or treatment for any medical condition whatsoever – including Lung Cancer.
Always seek the advice of a professional medical doctor.
***************************************************************************************